{"id":22513,"date":"2024-01-29T16:56:28","date_gmt":"2024-01-29T13:56:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wikidollar.net\/22513\/the-var-review-dias-on\/"},"modified":"2024-01-29T16:56:29","modified_gmt":"2024-01-29T13:56:29","slug":"the-var-review-dias-on","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wikidollar.net\/?p=22513","title":{"rendered":"The VAR Review: Dias on Vicario; Newcastle’s ‘handball’ goal"},"content":{"rendered":"

The VAR Review: Dias on Vicario; Newcastle’s ‘handball’ goal\u060c<\/p>\n

\n

The Video Assistant Referee causes controversy every week, but how are decisions made and are they correct?<\/p>\n

After each weekend we review the major incidents to examine and explain the process both in terms of VAR protocol and the Laws of the Game. This week<\/a> is a special FA Cup fourth round.<\/p>\n

– How VAR decisions affected each Prem club in 2023-24<\/strong>
– VAR in the Premier League: Ultimate Guide<\/strong><\/p>\n

In this week's VAR review:<\/strong> Manchester City's winning goal against Tottenham Hotspur was hotly debated due to a possible foul on goalkeeper Guglielmo Vicario, and should Luton Town's opener have counted against Everton? Plus, a possible handball in the build-up to Newcastle United's opening goal at Fulham.<\/p>\n\n

Possible goal disallowed: Dias challenge on Vicario <\/h2>\n

What happened: <\/strong>Manchester City won the match in the 88th minute when Nathan Ak\u00e9 headed the ball home from close range after a corner, but VAR checked a possible foul on goalkeeper Vicario de R\u00faben Dias (look here<\/strong>.)<\/p>\n

VAR decision: <\/strong>The objective is maintained.<\/p>\n