One of the major questions surrounding the upcoming flagship Galaxy S24 series is how Samsung will handle the rollout of the two chipsets that would power the lineup: the local Exynos 2400 and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy. Traditionally, Samsung used Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chips for its Galaxy S phones in the US and China, while the latest Exynos application processor (AP) was used everywhere else in the world.
Latest rumor has it that Samsung is using two different chipsets for the Galaxy S24 series
This year,
Samsung decided to go with the overclocked Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy AP to power all Galaxy S23 phones everywhere. But with a fairly powerful deca-core Exynos 2400 available (although not as powerful as the
Snapdragon 8 generation 3 according to Geekbench tests), the latest rumor has it that Samsung would equip the
Galaxy S24 And
Galaxy S24+ with the Exynos 2400 in all markets except the USA and China. In these markets, both models will have the
Snapdragon 8 generation 3 for Galaxy under the hood.
Geekbench result for Korean Galaxy S24 Ultra shows Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 usage for Galaxy
Continuing this rumor, all Galaxy S24 Ultra units, regardless of which market they are released in, will be powered by the Snapdragon 8 generation 3 for the Galaxy chipset. Before moving forward, you may remember that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy had an overclocked Cortex-X3 Prime core that ran at 3.36 GHz compared to 3.19 GHz for the standard SoC variant. This year’s Snapdragon “for Galaxy” chip is a little weirder according to “X” tipster Yogesh Brar.
As we told you the other day, Brar says that the Prime Cortex-X4 core of the Snapdragon 8 generation 3 The Galaxy chip will be overclocked to 3.40 GHz (compared to 3.30 GHz on the non-Galaxy chip). Snapdragon 8 generation 3). So far, so good. But Brar adds that both the Performance CPU core and the Efficiency CPU core will be underclocked, which is quite surprising. The Cortex-A720 Performance core will run at 3.20GHz/3.00GHz on the standard variant and 3.15GHz/2.97GHz on the “for Galaxy” version. The Cortex-A520 Efficiency core will be clocked at 2.30 GHz on the standard SoC and at 3.27 GHz on the “for Galaxy” version.
According to
my smart priceTHE
Galaxy S24 And
Galaxy S24 Ultra both were put through the Geekbench benchmark test and confirmed some rumors about which chips Samsung would place in each of its upcoming flagships.
Galaxy S24 models.
The Korean version of Galaxy S24 Ultra carries the model number SM-S928N and the Geekbench test revealed that it comes with 12GB of RAM. The test also showed that the phone sports the overclocked system Snapdragon 8 generation 3 for Galaxy AP running at the clock speeds we mentioned two paragraphs above this one. In case you’re wondering, the single-core score was 2,214 and the multi-core score was 6,744.
Exynos 2400 SoC will power Galaxy S24 and Galaxy S24+ in most markets
The Korean Geekbench test Galaxy S24 (SM-S921N) revealed that it is powered by the deca-core Exynos 2400 with one Prime CPU core running at 3.21 GHz, two Performance CPU cores clocked at 2.90 GHz, three Additional performance clocked at 2.59 GHz and four efficiency processors. cores running at 1.96 GHz. The phone was also tested with 8GB of RAM. THE Galaxy S24 achieved 2051 and 6204 for single-core and multi-core scores, respectively.
Geekbench test for Korean Galaxy S24 shows it will be powered by Exynos 2400 SoC outside the US and China
So what does all this mean? Well, it looks like word is flying about the chipset situation for the Galaxy S24 range attached to. To reiterate, those in the US and China will get all three models powered by the Snapdragon 8 generation 3 for Galaxy. In other markets, the Galaxy S24 And Galaxy S24+ will carry the latest chipset from Samsung while the Galaxy S24 Ultra will be powered by the Snapdragon 8 generation 3 for Galaxy.
Why would Samsung do this? You won’t like the answer, but using the Exynos 2400 SoC in its phones saves Samsung money. Not only is it cheaper for Samsung to get chips it designed itself, but Qualcomm is known for its “no license, no chips” business practice. You can’t blame Samsung for wanting to cut costs, especially since the Exynos 2400 appears to be a very capable chipset.
